Internship Blog Portfolio
#3
Expected outcomes are expressed as
program standards derived from RCW 28A.405.100, which are aligned with
State-designated teacher preparation approval standards shown in WAC
181-78A-270. Program standards include criteria (e.g. 1.), elements (e.g. 1.1),
and examples. Log
In the following blog entry I have
chosen to reflect upon this program standard 3. Differentiation. As an instructor, I feel it is my responsibility to
expect all of my students to learn at high levels and I believe that it is my responsibility
to assure that all students learn.
Differentiation is the process by which I make this happen. It is the ability of an instructor to adjust
her lesson plan in a way that allows all students to meet the objective. I try to approach knowledge and the
acquisition there to as a fluid process, a flexible one. My goal is to encourage my students to question
and contemplate. Rigidity in a curriculum
prevents this outcome.
Program standard à
3.
Differentiation - The teacher acquires and uses specific knowledge about
students’ cultural, individual intellectual and social development and uses
that knowledge to adjust their practice by employing strategies that advance
student learning.
States the background by which I as
a teacher may achieve this goal of inculcating intellectual thought. As a teacher, I have the ability to present
information in a number of ways. By utilizing
the cultural understanding that I poses as well as the individual background I
have on my students, I have the power to transform the learning process into a successful
cataclysm!
This entry will focus on Standard à
3.2
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness in Lesson Adjustments
Teacher makes a minor adjustment to a lesson, and the
adjustment occurs smoothly.
I recently had the opportunity to
put this standard into practice. I was
teaching a unit on Human System Interactions.
The beginning of this table was then projected on the white board. This was not a complete table but rather an
example so students could know how to get started. I then asked my students to create a comprehensive
table and fill it in as they read through the 6 associated text book pages.
I soon learned that this task was
too much for several of my students. I needed to print a copy of my table for
some students that were having difficulty completing the design on their
own. The creation of the table itself
was either taking way too long or the precision of the tables draw were inadequate
for a proper data analysis.
This was a great opportunity for me
to put Bloom’s Taxonomy (Bloom, 1956) into action! My goal was to move all of my students toward
higher levels of thinking, processing, and questioning. We spent the prior classes focused on knowledge
and comprehension of the disease states and the associated symptoms. We observed video footage of a patients with
numerous symptoms and we were now at the point of differential diagnosis. Most students had at this point become
competent with these basic skills. Hence
the goal was to move all students to this slightly more complex tasks. I was now requiring my students to think at a
higher level, to compare, contrast, and develop a degree of argumentation
through the use of collected evidence. This
table was not simply a more difficult task that needed to require a lot of
energy or time. Rather, the goal was to
make the data readily available for conclusions to be drawn.
As the lesson progressed I learned
that numerous students were unclear how to complete this table on their
own. They did not seem to understand how
to fill it out. This gave me an opportunity
to adjust the lesson further by the class completing the table together as
opposed to the individual assignment. These
minor adjustments allowed for all students to understand the goal, which was to
see what particular symptoms different disease shared. The outcome was thus successful although the
route to attaining it was adjusted from my original plan.
My next
steps will involve some reflection with the students on the assignment. I have a passion for human physiology and
sometimes lose track of myself in the subject matter. My hope in having students self-reflect on
this unit is to better understand their level of comprehension and to see if
they found the flow of presentation adequate.
Below is a list of the key concepts I am hooping my students took away. I will be able to better evaluate that these
goals were met after I review their self-reflections.
References
Anderson,
L. W. (2009). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of
Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley
Longman.
Wong, H.
K., Wong, R. T., & Seroyer, C. (2009). The first days of school: how to
be an effective teacher. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications.
No comments:
Post a Comment